2002/03/20 Council Minutes

TOWN OF BEDFORD

TOWN COUNCIL MINUTES

MARCH 20, 2002

A meeting of the Bedford Town Council was held on Wednesday, March 20, 2002. Present were Councilors David Danielson, William Greiner, Kevin Keyes, Thomas Riley, Michael Scanlon, Bruce Searing, and William Van Anglen. Also present was Keith Hickey, Town Manager. Chairman Scanlon opened the meeting at 7:15 PM.

Mr. Greiner said on page 10 and 11, Ms. Haverstein’s name should be changed to Havenstein.

Mr. Scanlon presented Mr. Danielson with a plaque for his year of service as Chairman of the Town Council.

Mr. Scanlon announced that the Council meetings in April will be Wednesday, April 10 and Tuesday, April 30 at the old fire station.

John Vaillancourt, representing the Bedford Soccer Board, said they have been working with the Town to straighten out the John Rootes situation. It is now 8 months later, and they don’t know if Mr. Rootes is coming back or not. Mr. Vaillancourt had several conversations with Mr. Hickey who informed him that nothing was set in stone, and Mr. Rootes had 2 weeks offered to him, but at this point the Town had made no deals with him. The Soccer Board would like to know. He said Mr. Greiner has told him consistently that there is no deal. Mr. Vaillancourt asked point blank does Parks and Recreation have a deal with Mr. Rootes. Mr. Greiner said no they do not have a deal. He said Mr. Hickey has approached the Soccer League and Mr. Rootes to negotiate. Mr. Greiner understands they have not been offered weeks to come to Bedford, and that is still a discussion point. Mr. Vaillancourt said they tentatively have a meeting with Mr. Rootes tomorrow. He said the League’s issues are 3: They want to be able to run their 3 weeks. With 5 weeks coming, it is going to hurt them. The second issue is Mr. Rootes has his flyers out, and his web page is up and running. Mr. Vaillancourt wants to know what is going on from the Council point of view. Mr. Scanlon said we don’t have any control if Mr. Rootes wants to advertise.

Mr. Hickey said Mr. Rootes contacted Brian Ross (Recreation Director) and asked what dates are available. He was given 2 available weeks. That is all we have done. Mr. Greiner said nothing has changed since he spoke to Mr. Vaillancourt. Mr. Vaillancourt said Mr. Rootes has taken some pretty tough shots at the Soccer Board.

Mr. Searing said the Town Manager is saying there is no deal. He sees advertising for dates that have not been officially given. If we have not given him the dates, and there are still issues that have caused us not to give him the dates, and they are advertising their soccer camp in our town. He assumes they are planning on using our fields. He said that doesn’t put them in good standing with the town. Mr. Greiner said when he checked the website they were advertising Sportsmen’s Field. He said the only issue with Sportsmen’s is that Parks and Recreation took Sportsmen’s off line and said any camp would have to go to Legacy.

Mr. Riley asked if those are the dates that were offered. Mr. Greiner said we did not offer them. Mr. Hickey said Mr. Rootes contacted Mr. Ross to find out what dates were available, and these were the 2 weeks that were available.

Bedford Town Council – March 20, 2002 – Page 3

Mr. Hickey said the Soccer League has an issue with the Rootes camp. It has been his opinion that that the majority of the issues are between the Rootes camp and the Soccer League. He thought to satisfy everyone, if everyone could sit down with Mr. Hickey as mediator and try to come up with some type of an understanding or agreement. That meeting was to be held tomorrow. He received an e-mail from Mr. Rootes indicating that in his opinion he had a deal to be the sole provider of camps with the Bedford Soccer League. Mr. Rootes is not coming tomorrow.

Mr. Scanlon asked if we have done anything with the camp policy. Has Mr. Ross finalized it. Mr. Hickey said there are 2 different issues. He would like to see this as an agenda item. Mr. Greiner referred to a February 18 letter from Mr. Rootes which is not at all like the conversation with Mr. Hickey. Mr. Hickey said he felt we could do this without Mr. Rootes coming up, but it became apparent that was not going to happen, so he tried to get Mr. Rootes to come up and sit down with the Soccer League to try and get this resolved. Mr. Hickey said this is not a town issue. It is between the Soccer League who think they are owed money by Mr. Rootes.

Mr. Scanlon said the last draft of the policy said you had to be in good standing with the league to use the fields. He thinks that policy needs to be resolved. Mr. Searing said they have this ongoing discrepancy with the Soccer League that is still out there, and that is somewhat of a separate issue in terms of whether they get field space. The problem he sees is you have this discrepancy, i.e. verbal negotiations and agreements, that were had between Mr. Rootes and the Soccer League. Now what we are seeing that does have to do with the Town is they are advertising when they don’t even have the fields. He thinks this is a Town issue. He feels we owe it to the Bedford Soccer League to protect them. They have provided a phenomenal service to the kids. He hopes we do not release those dates until the Council decides if they are in good standing.

Mr. Scanlon said we do not have a policy now that they have to be in good standing. He feels the field use policy should come back on April 10. Mr. Keyes asked how many weeks of camp they are planning to sponsor other than Mr. Rootes. Mr. Vaillancourt said 3 weeks with Nutmeg Soccer Camps. Mr. Keyes asked if that is enough to satisfy the needs of Bedford. Mr. Vaillancourt said it would serve it better than it has in the past, because in the past they used to cram everything into 2 weeks. Mr. Keyes said based on your experience, do we need 5 weeks. Mr. Vaillancourt said no. He said if Mr. Rootes gets 2 weeks, they will have to look and see if it is profitable enough for them to have their camps come in for 3 weeks.

Mr. Danielson cautioned if they want to compete in August, and if the kids don’t want to come, they don’t come. Mr. Keyes is tired of hearing about someone from 1500 miles away coming and telling us what we should be doing with our leagues and our fields.

Bedford Town Council – March 20, 2002 – Page 4

Mr. Riley said he is only asking for 2 weeks, and if 2 weeks is available, and he is in good standing with the Town, then we have to look at it. We can’t say yes to one and no to another. Mr. Keyes disagrees. He feels we should let the Bedford Soccer League make the decision. Mr. Danielson said it is not a matter of the Soccer Board working with Mr. Rootes, it is a business wanting to come and use the fields. We should be careful not to inject ourselves into a situation between two business organizations.

Mr. Greiner said it isn’t necessarily just between their word and our word. Alicia Rootes told Mr. Scanlon that they did have a deal. Mr. Greiner asked the 2 parties to negotiate in good faith.

Mr. Scanlon would like to see this come up on April 10. If we can pass the policy, and they are not in good standing with the league they are not coming. Mr. Vaillancourt said the whole point is his web site is up and running and people will start sending money.

Mr. Scanlon asked if the Council has a problem if we instruct the Town Manager to contact Mr. Rootes, not to be using Bedford dates because at this point he does not have those dates. Mr. Riley said because it was not an agenda item, he does not feel it is appropriate to put a motion on the table without notification of what was being discussed. Mr. Scanlon said we need a policy in place. Mr. Greiner said we don’t need a policy. The Council can make a decision as to who uses our fields. Mr. Scanlon feels they have overstepped their bounds. We have not given them these dates. Mr. Vaillancourt said Mr. Rootes has held up their money for 8 months. He was never supposed to get a bill from the Town, and he did get a bill from the Town. Mr. Scanlon believes the Soccer League has been given their 3 weeks so they can go ahead with their camp. Mr. Searing thinks we have an obligation to provide some type of protection to the Town league. If they think the success of their 3 weeks is jeopardized because we are not closing the door. We are leaving the door open for another 3 weeks. We are telling them to stop advertising, but can we legally. What damage can be done to the Bedford Soccer League for the next 3 weeks by us not closing the door.

Mr. Van Anglen agrees with Mr. Searing. They are advertising and are going to start collecting money. He believes we do have to give public notice. His concern is that there could be people that would be paying into this that would then not be able to get the money back. Mr. Scanlon said we are going to ask them to stop advertising and collecting money in Bedford.

Bedford Town Council – March 20, 2001 – Page 5

Mr. Riley asked for the minutes of the last meeting when the Council discussed the policy. Mr. Greiner asked if we can take a straw poll. Mr. Hickey said it would be meaningless. Mr. Scanlon said it will be resolved April 10.

Someone in the audience said this is not a matter between 2 businesses. He feels they are an extension of the town. He is for profit and the Soccer League is not.

Jay Joseph, 118 County Road, read an article in the newspaper about asking for fields. He said they have asked for fields. There are 8 fields needed. That is a huge issue for the town. If it is not Joppa, then where. Mr. Scanlon said at the budget meeting he proposed $200,000 for the purchase of land, and it did not get a second.

Jim Morgan, 39 Riddle Drive, asked if anything has been done about getting Mr. LaMontagne to come in and talk about Greenfield Farms. He asked to do that at the April 10 meeting. Mr. Scanlon said that will be discussed in Councilor comments.

Mr. Scanlon said he would like a consensus on whether the Chairman should vote or not. He would prefer to vote. He feels it is important for the people in the audience to see how he feels. The consensus was he can vote. Mr. Scanlon said then he will vote on all issues.

Mr. Danielson recused himself since one of the bidders is a client of the company he belongs to.

Mr. Searing asked if Chappell had the same model number, L3010 because before they were bidding on L3410, so they had that model and came in and underbid MB Tractor & Equipment; Mr. Hickey said they originally bid on the wrong model.

Bedford Town Council – March 20, 2002 – Page 6

Mr. Scanlon said it is his understanding that the State has declared a step 3 water emergency and Manchester is talking about it. Mr. Hickey said Manchester has some recommendations to be proposed to the Water Commissioners on March 27. If they are supportive, there will be a public hearing in April to adopt those regulations. Pennichuck Water Works purchases all their water from Manchester Water and Merrimack Village District, and they will have to comply with the regulations from both of those organizations.

Mr. Scanlon said we cannot mandate anything for those with a private well. We can encourage them to conserve water. Mr. Hickey said we have posted on the web site the guidelines from the State to help provide information to residents. We cannot control what someone does with their private well. It is important for us to be proactive. Mr. Hickey said Mr. Searing suggested that he and another Councilor do some type of TV show on BCTV to try to be proactive and promote water conservation. Mr. Van Anglen would like to help with that. He asked about scheduling a meeting with Manchester Water and Pennichuck to discuss their plans for drought management. He referred to a newspaper article about Manchester Water contracts with Bedford. He asked who enforces those restrictions. Mr. Hickey said Manchester Water does because they own the water. He can talk to the Police Chief to make sure their officers are aware of what the restrictions are, and if they see someone not complying to have them notify Manchester Water.

Mr. Danielson concurs with those ideas. He suggested we have something that is fairly consistent that is going into the papers and on BCTV. Even though we have no regulation over private wells, we should be very concerned about the various leagues and their irrigation systems. We should think about recommending alternate uses. It is completely voluntary. He recommends that this be under the Health Dept. and let him be the person who pushes that. Mr. Riley agrees with Mr. Danielson. He asked this be on the retreat agenda and get ideas from other towns. He would like to be proactive instead of reactive. He feels a department head should regulate it. Mr. Searing said the Karen White (Town Planner) memo indicated we should distribute fact sheets.. He thinks one of the things is distributing this in some form townwide, i.e. mailing in the “Banner”. He thinks it would be a good idea to have copies at the Library and Town Office Building. Mr. Danielson said also in public places like Dunkin Donuts or any public place where people are going to be. Mr. Searing suggested Mr. Hickey go to the papers and suggest a special article. Mr. Danielson said this is a health issue if we do not have water. Mr. Searing asked what direction can we give Mr. Hickey to move forward. Mr. Hickey can do that.

Mr. Van Anglen suggested a retreat topic be a water council to drive this issue.

Bedford Town Council – March 20, 2002 – Page 7

Mr. Hickey said the “Banner” should be out around April 13, and he will incorporate as much of the information that he can. He thinks it is good idea for Mr. Searing and Mr. Van Anglen to do a TV show. Mr. Scanlon said we have had problems in the past with private companies sticking their suction pumps into private ponds and pulling water out. He said we should make sure people understand that is illegal. Mr. Keyes said we can send the material over to the schools. Mr. Searing said if it rains for the next 30 days, we still should continue on. He asked about distribution at the Transfer Station on a Saturday. Mr. Scanlon asked Mr. Hickey to coordinate “dump day.”

Mr. Danielson said we should ask the Town Manager to come back at the next meeting with a step plan that says what we are going to do. It can be an ongoing step. Mr. Scanlon said the retreat is on April 13, which is only 3 days after the next meeting. Mr. Hickey will include something in the packet and will e-mail it.

Richard Moore, 27 Bedford Center Road, thinks it is a great suggestion to do this campaign to try and get people to conserve groundwater. He studies groundwater and would be happy to look at the suggestions and offer comments. He was at a conference last week, and they said about 90% of the household water that goes back through the septic system ends up recharging the aquifers. So, there is not nearly as big a loss with that as with lawn irrigation. Trying to conserve on landscaping is a much more effective mechanism.

Mr. Danielson asked if Mr. Moore could give the same presentation to the Council that he gave to the Planning Board. Mr. Scanlon asked Mr. Hickey to work that out.

Mr. Riley read the ratings in terms of resident concerns: 1) Road maintenance; 2) Open space preservation; 3) Traffic management; 4) Land use permitting; 5) Recreation programs and facilities; 6) Responsiveness to citizen concerns; 7) Police protection; 8) Fire protection; 9) Transfer station; 10) Property assessment services; 11) Code enforcement; 12) Emergency medical services; 13) Library services; 14) Tax collection services.

Mr. Scanlon said the survey results are on the web page. Mr. Hickey said we have been exploring the possibility of offering a debit/credit card for payment of taxes, motor vehicle registration, etc. When we asked the question whether people would be willing to incur the fee we incur, the answer was no 4 to 1. We will continue to explore it, but that was a surprise to him. The information we gathered on the road improvements and whether or not people would be interested in increasing taxes to support accelerating the road program, there was a majority that said yes, but not by a tremendous amount. We need to be wary that there obviously is a concern.

Bedford Town Council – March 20, 2002 – Page 8

Mr. Danielson said one of the things we ought to do on the idea of credit cards, if we could register over the web. That way only the people who are going to use it will pay for it. He believes over time we will see this increasing. Mr. Hickey said we would be willing to offer that. We are just trying to recoup any cost we incur. Mr. Greiner said the vast majority of people have their taxes escrowed, so to them it is not a service they would care for. Mr. Hickey said this would also be for building permits, motor vehicle fees, etc. He said maybe we could lease or buy an ATM machine for the lobby. Mr. Searing said it seems like we listed 14 town services, and this came in last. He does not feel it is time to pursue this.

Mr. Greiner thinks it was interesting on the roads. Clearly it was a big issue on roads, but in terms of paying for it, he thinks we need to be cautious and look at all the options. Mr. Searing said based on this survey, a $26 million bond would have been shot down.

Mr. Danielson said on Joppa Hill, active recreation came out third. Mr. Greiner said there is always a percentage of people that vote no on everything. For passive recreation, he wonders if that is the no vote. Mr. Searing said this tells him that pretty substantially everybody supports all 3 (passive recreation, active recreation, educational farm). Mr. Scanlon thought that number would be very small compared to where it is.

Mr. Keyes said his concern is he did not know this was going to be handed out, and wishes it was put out the week before. Mr. Greiner said on the flip side, that would have allowed an e-mail campaign. This got the real true perspective.

Mr. Greiner said re the 3 biggest things: road maintenance – we’ve got a plan. Open space preservation – we received an LCHIP grant for master planning the area and also are going to be receiving the money from Amherst because the bond passed over there. Traffic management – he assumes they are talking about Route 101, and we are in the middle of the study. We are moving positively in all three areas of concern. Mr. Danielson said the concept of traffic management, the assumption is it is 101. He wonders if that is the only thing that is on people’s minds. What about the feeder roads.

Mr. Searing said re New Boston Road/Route 114, the Council discussed where it is in the state que, and Mr. Riley mentioned the intersection at St. Anselm was in the process. Mr. Riley said it is done. The White Avenue intersection has been approved by the state, and that is in the planning stages now. The Donald Street/114 has sent a notice that any future developments should put money towards that intersection. Mr. Searing asked where is the 114/New Boston Road. Mr. Riley said that is the last one. White Avenue is before that in the que. Mr. Danielson said there was a meeting with the state, and the plan is to try to widen the intersection going north on 114 at the intersection of Donald Street for a right turn lane.

Bedford Town Council – March 20, 2002 – Page 9

Mr. Searing said when we talked about this 6+ months ago, a lot of the development that’s going on in Town is coming into that intersection, and there is a lot of usage to that intersection from Goffstown. He asked if there is any way we can fast track that on the state level. Mr. Greiner asked if we talked about getting dialog with Goffstown to see if they would contribute. Mr. Danielson said that was before they did the work on St. Anselm Drive, and they contributed to that. Mr. Riley said we can ask the Planning Director to get an impact fee from any development impacting that intersection. Mr. Danielson would like to push a little harder on the regional impact on that intersection.

Susan Tufts-Moore, 27 Bedford Center Road, thanked the town for putting the survey results on the web site. Regarding traffic management it may also be speed not just volume. Regarding Joppa Hill, she thinks it is very hard to interpret the results. She feels the no’s are just as important as the yes’s.

Mr. Searing said in a recent meeting we set tentatively that the staff would be making a presentation on May 8 regarding the findings on Joppa Hill. He requested that we make sure we follow through on that. At that meeting, on the agenda we can include a thorough discussion as to whether we want to form a Joppa Hill Committee and decide what shape that committee would take and to start moving forward on forming a master plan for that property. Mr. Scanlon asked if we can have the whole committee come that night. Mr. Riley feels it is such an important subject, let’s not have a big agenda so we do not have to rush.

Mr. Hickey said the LCHIP would like to see us work with Amherst to provide a conservation program. Mr. Danielson understands the LCHIP was to do planning. It appears to be very focused on conservation planning with Amherst. Mr. Hickey said they want to see a conservation plan for the property with Amherst where appropriate. They commented on ultimately what we want to see on the property in the future.

Mr. Searing said throughout the budget hearings and budget meeting, we committed to a period when we would have a road plan in place. He thinks we need to, as soon as possible, have Mr. Hickey come back with an outline of things we need to do and a time schedule we are going to follow. He recommends at the next meeting we have a time schedule and items we need to accomplish to meet that July goal. Mr. Scanlon said that is on the retreat agenda.

Mr. Hickey said we talked in the past about having Mr. Riley and Mr. Searing be the Public Works liaison to work with Ed Kelly (Director of Public Works), Paul Belanger (Supt. Of Public Works) and Mr. Hickey on the road program. Mr. Searing asked permission between now and the retreat to work with Mr. Hickey to design the time line. Mr. Scanlon said yes.

Mr. Greiner said in the reading file there is a memo from Nancy Larson (Planner I) regarding Parker Ridge, and it was decided that the Planning Board would not have another public hearing. He wonders if it would make sense to have a public hearing so people will be informed. His concern is it was a very contentious and emotional issue with a lot of it based on water. If we do nothing, people might come forward and say things happened without them being notified. Mr. Scanlon asked if we could send a letter. Mr. Hickey said there is the concern that the developer had that if we had a public hearing, they would have no ability to appeal. The Planning Board Chairman and Planning Director have made contact with some of the more vocal people about the proposal. Everyone they spoke to is in agreement that they are satisfied, and that there is not a need for a public hearing. Mr. Hickey suggested once we have confirmation in writing that the well field will be capped and water will be supplied from Merrimack with Pennichuck, is to do a letter to the neighborhood to let them know what is happening, and the reasons why there was no public hearing. Mr. Greiner said his concern is to make sure that people are notified.

Mr. Greiner said there was a sense that the Planning Board should be cognizant about discussing with the Council in terms of negotiating future deals. Mr. Hickey talked to the chairman, and he is aware of that. He feels any deals need to come back to the Council. Mr. Hickey said we are talking about exchanging in-kind work for fees. Mr. Danielson said the reverse has been true in the past where the Planning Board would go to the Town and say, tell us what you need, and the Planning Board would then go to the developer and say this is what we need.

Mr. Greiner said in the case of Greenfield Farms, that is an example. Did that come back to the Council. Mr. Danielson can’t remember. Mr. Scanlon asked if it is unreasonable to say the developer should come to the Council to negotiate a deal and then go back to the Planning Board. Mr. Keyes suggested this be on the agenda for the retreat. Mr. Danielson cautioned we check State Law because that is very close to doing Planning Board stuff. Mr. Greiner said the reason for bringing it up is we have 2 bad decisions. One is trading the current use money for Legacy Park, and the other is Greenfield Farms.

Bedford Town Council – March 20, 2002 – Page 11

Mr. Greiner said Southern NH Planning Commission (SNHPC) has some issues with the 101 project. Nashua Regional Planning has been very involved in this process, and SNHPC has been uninvolved. Part of it is because the money for the other communities came through Nashua. Mr. Greiner, who is on the 101 committee, would like to see more involvement from SNHPC. Mr. Danielson said Moni Sharma (SNHPC) said he has not been involved, and he does not know why. Mr. Danielson will check further.

Mr. Greiner said Amherst has purchased the land from us. They are an SB 2 town, and got 64% of the voters to approve it. Under SB 300 this would not have passed.

Mr. Greiner said last week they had a 101 meeting and there were 3 recommendations. One of them is going to the Highway Safety Committee next week and that is to examine the speed limits, and reducing the speed limits west of Wallace Road to the Amherst town line as an interim measure until we can get some turning lanes. The other 2 items were a recommendation to the Council to immediately explore funding a fully signalized intersection at Hardy, Jenkins and Route 101. The third was an overpass from Nashua Road to Bell Hill Road with a connector road going from Nashua Road to Wallace Road.

Mr. Danielson said re speed limits, he believes that process can come out of the Safety Committee as a recommendation to talk to the State Highway because it is a state highway. Mr. Greiner asked if we need to make a decision supporting the recommendations from the 101 committee. Mr. Hickey said at some point we should find out the cost to the town. Mr. Danielson would like to see that connector road part of a larger, overall plan. Mr. Hickey said we will bring the state in and discuss the long term solutions and the interim short term solutions. Mr. Scanlon asked if there is a consensus to allow Mr. Greiner to move forward. All agreed.

Mr. Riley thanked the Council for sending flowers to his mother. She is home now and doing well. Mr. Riley thanked everyone involved in the election. This was democracy at its finest.

Mr. Danielson asked to send a message to the Moderator, Assistant Moderator, staff and Police Chief for moving everyone around.

Mr. Riley said this is the first time he has ever seen a downturn in motor vehicle revenues in February. We need to keep an eye on that.

Bedford Town Council – March 20, 2002 – Page 12

Mr. Danielson said the Chairman asked him to do this board, and he said he would do it with the caveat that his classes are typically on Mondays and Wednesdays, and there will be many nights he can’t be there. Mr. Keyes will attend when either one can’t make it.

Parks and Recreation Commission – Mr. Searing regular and Mr. Greiner alternate.

Mr. Scanlon said last year there were a number of occasions where the regular member could not make it, and the alternate member was not notified. He asked each Councilor to make sure to call Mr. Scanlon if neither member can make a meeting.

Bedford Town Council – March 20, 2002 – Page 13

Mr. Scanlon asked if Mr. Hickey spoke with Mr. LaMontagne re Greenfield Farms. Mr. Hickey said he has been trying to contact him, and he has not returned the calls. He looked at the agreement and it says he will get the field on line as soon as he possibly can or before Phase IV is done. Mr. Scanlon said that field was supposed to be done. Mr. Hickey said he has said the field would be ready this spring. We are withholding some items he may need in the future until he gets it done. Mr. Danielson said the property has changed hands. Mr. Scanlon said he is still responsible. If we cannot get a satisfactory answer, he would like to have him in here. Right now he is using it as a staging ground. He said the Town waived considerable impact fees. Mr. Riley asked if we could ask the Planner to give us a letter indicating if all the obligations have been met, and if not what the deadlines are to be met.

Mr. Scanlon said the Chairman speaks for the Council, so if anyone gets a call from a reporter, if you feel it appropriate to speak, then you can speak, otherwise have them call the Chairman. Mr. Scanlon noticed tonight that everything should be directed through the chair. Tonight a lot of questions were being asked directly from the audience.

Mr. Searing asked on the different committees, he assumes there is some latitude to respond to questions from the press. Mr. Scanlon said you have all the latitude you want. Mr. Riley said if you are speaking for the Council, it should come from the chair. If you are speaking as an individual, that’s a different situation.

Mr. Scanlon said the annual retreat will be Saturday, April 13 at 10 AM with the place to be forthcoming.

Mr. Scanlon wants the Council to get together with the School Board. We said we were going to get together 4 times a year, and last year it was twice. He asked to put them on a regular rotation.

Mr. Greiner said on the 101 Study Committee some members have never showed up or very rarely. They have not seen the Planning Board rep for months. He asked the Planning Board to appoint someone else for that spot. Mr. Keyes asked when the appointments are made to boards and commissions. The deadline for letters is March 22. Mr. Scanlon said the process he would like isD not a committee, but a committee of the whole. He would like to invite the chairman of each board/commission to sit as an observer. Mr. Searing asked if he is concerned about the time it might take to get through all this. Mr. Scanlon said we could do 20-minute interviews. Mr. Danielson asked if we could do them in executive session. Mr. Hickey said we cannot do that, but we could do them at 5 PM on a regular meeting night. Mr. Keyes asked if we interview existing members. Mr. Scanlon would like to do that. Mr. Van Anglen said an interview with 7 people is a little intimidating. Mr. Scanlon thinks it is important all Councilors get involved.